Raymond B. Fosdick: "We Must Not Be Afraid of Change.""When the last glacier retreated northward from what is now Connecticut, it left behind as mementos of its visit, great boulders of rock which are now strewn lavishly across the state. Several of them, as large as a corncrib and many tons in weight, were deposited on my farm, and for fifteen years I have watched one of them fight a losing battle with an ash tree. The tree evidently started in a seed lodged in a tiny pocket in the top of the rock. "When I first saw it, it was a sturdy sapling that had made for itself a comfortable crevice for its roots. Today, its irresistible growth has torn the massive rock into fragments. This is the law of life. The future belongs not to rigid absolutes, whether they are primal rocks of unyielding social arrangements, but to the thing that can grow, whether it is a tree or a democracy." Raymond B. Fosdick, "We Must Not Be Afraid of Change," The New York Times, April 3, 1949 This is the starting few paragraphs to a full article written by Raymond B. Fosdick. If you think that what we are facing today is a new threat to democracy, I would highly recommend reading it in its entirety. Change and the discussion of change is the way of a people united through democracy . . . a diversity, not so much achieved through shades of color or non-color—black and white, but . . . through thoughtful discussion. Peter E. Greulich Select the image or link below to access the full article. 
0 Comments
Dwight D. Eisenhower: "Violence Cannot Bring About Right.""We got a peace of a sort almost five years ago [post World War II]. It has been more or less with us in the guise of what we call a cold war. … But there is a second kind of peace, and in our aspirations, it must be to bring to all men living together the confidence that bodily harm will not be used to make them agree—that violence cannot bring about right." General Dwight D. Eisenhower, May 1950 It would seem that this fundamental truth holds true whether it is in international relationships or within our own political system here at home. "Bodily harm" cannot be the means to make individuals agree. To preserve the freedom of speech, we have an obligation to listen to each other. Peter E. Greulich, December 2022  |
Peter E. GreulichPeter E. has been studying IBM and early American corporate history since his retirement in 2011. These are his thoughts and musings, and of those whose biographies and autobiographies he has read with links to articles and book reviews on this website. 
Contact the author directly.
|
RSS Feed