If my foresight were as clear as my hindsight, I should be better off by a damned sight.
If my foresight were as clear as my hindsight, I should be better off by a damned sight.
IBM's 21st Century Patent Leadership Home Page |
|
|
Published July 26, 2021
|
In 2018, as annotated on the chart above, a new measurement took front and center: IFI Claims Patent Services “Ultimate Owner Ranking.” Although this is still not a perfect measurement for patents, it is more effective in measuring a corporation's patent ownership, efficiency, and effectiveness.
By this new "patent families" measurement, IBM is a very, very distant second place to Samsung.
By this new "patent families" measurement, IBM is a very, very distant second place to Samsung.
IBM's 21st Century Patent Leadership
- Introduction
- Three Decades of Patent Leadership
- A New Patent Measurement Makes its Mark
- IBM's Ultimate Owner Patent Performance
Introduction
There is no taking away IBM’s decades of patent leadership from those who are responsible for moving ideas into the realm of patentable, revenue-producing offerings. Patents have been important to IBM since its founding. Other American corporations such as the Eastman Kodak Corporation have transformed whole industries through patents, in its case taking photography from the realm of professional only, to an enjoyable form of mass recreation.
In 1938, Tom Watson Sr. told his shareholders that in 1937 “85 patents with 985 claims were granted” and “299 applications were pending.” He commented that in the twenty-four years since he took over the company, it had obtained 1301 patents.
In comparison, in 2020 alone, IBM applied for 7,772 patents and was granted 9,138 patents.
It is a proud history, but change is on the horizon.
In 1938, Tom Watson Sr. told his shareholders that in 1937 “85 patents with 985 claims were granted” and “299 applications were pending.” He commented that in the twenty-four years since he took over the company, it had obtained 1301 patents.
In comparison, in 2020 alone, IBM applied for 7,772 patents and was granted 9,138 patents.
It is a proud history, but change is on the horizon.
Three Decades of Patent Leadership
In 1992, Japanese companies had owned the first-place patent position for a decade. IBM was in a distant sixth place, but the next year it jumped from sixth into first place. It has not relinquished this first-place position since.
This leadership position has been maintained by the individuals who worked for four separate chief executive officers: Louis V. Gerstner, Samuel J. Palmisano, Virginia M. Rometty, and Arvind Krishna.
This leadership position has been maintained by the individuals who worked for four separate chief executive officers: Louis V. Gerstner, Samuel J. Palmisano, Virginia M. Rometty, and Arvind Krishna.
This is an amazing performance turned in by the corporation’s worldwide team of engineers, architects, and developers.
A New Patent Measurement Makes its Mark
In 2018, a new measurement took front and center as a measurement for a corporation's patent performance: IFI Claims Patent Services “Ultimate Owner Ranking.” Although this is still not a perfect measurement for patents, it is more effective in measuring patent ownership, efficiency and effectiveness.
By this new, updated measurement, Samsung had in 2020 more than double the patent families of IBM: 109%.
By this new, updated measurement, Samsung had in 2020 more than double the patent families of IBM: 109%.
As seen in the following 2018 and 2019 charts Samsung has been growing its lead over IBM. This is an amazing performance on the part of Samsung Corporation and its researchers and engineers.
|
|
According to this new measurement, there is a new patent leader: Samsung. Of course, it all depends on how an analyst looks at the data, or how the displaced patent leader chooses to react to it. A corporation can continue to live in the past with its old glories and churn out press releases about a less meaningful measurement, or it can analyze, adapt and change its internal processes in a pursuit of excellence.
This is the topic of the following articles evaluating IBM and Samsung’s patent performances.
This is the topic of the following articles evaluating IBM and Samsung’s patent performances.
IBM's Ultimate Owner Patent Performance
These three articles are similar. The only difference is the actual performance of the top three performers in each year: 2020, 2019, and 2018. The articles utilize the same baseball analogy to discuss the differences between two competitors, one of which has a philosophy of “putting runners on base” (IBM) and another which “drives runners across home plate" (Samsung).